CATADA:Training and Technical Assistance Materials
  • APR Data Fidelity Review
    • Demonstration
    • Short-term Device Loan
    • Reuse
    • State Financing Activities
    • Training (including ICT Accessibility Training)
    • Technical Assistance
    • Coordination/Collaboration & State Improvement Outcomes
    • Leveraged Funding
    • Performance Measures
    • Data Management System
    • Historical Data Review
  • Short-term versus Open-ended Loans
  • Annual Performance Report Data Structure
  • Assistive Technology “Maker” Activities
  • Assistive Technology Advisory Council
  • Annual AT Data & Fiscal Calendar
  • State Plan Expenditure Tracking & Reporting Reporting
    • AT Act Requirements for Expenditure Tracking
    • Categorizing Expenditures
    • State Plan Expenditure Reporting
    • Budgeting Cycle
  • Flexibility, Comparability & Data Reporting
  • Contract Compensation Options & Data Reporting
    • Period-Based Compensation
    • Unit-Based Compensation
    • Mixed Compensation
  • Managing & Leveraging Resources
    • Managing AT Act Resources
    • Leveraging and Reporting Additional Resources
  • Lead Agency & Implementing Entity
  • Leveraged Funding Understanding Grant Types
  • When is “demonstrating devices” a device demonstration?
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. APR Data Fidelity Review

Reuse

PreviousShort-term Device LoanNextState Financing Activities

Last updated 2 years ago

Red Flag: Devices are reported with no retail dollar value.

If a number of AT devices is reported, there must be an associated retail price greater than zero. AT devices cannot be reported/acquired and no savings realized. If the device actually has no retail value, then it should be given away and not reported at all.

Red Flag: Average retail price per device is very low.

Look carefully at the total number of devices and retail price. If average retail price per device is very low ($1–$2), make sure the devices are really AT and not “consumables” or supplies.

Red Flag: Too many devices per recipient, or recipient always equals device number.

Look carefully at the total number of devices per recipient. While one person can have multiple AT devices reported, it is highly unusual for one recipient to have more than two to three devices acquired, especially multiple devices in the same AT type as those are typically reported as a group. Any one AT type device total that is larger than the total number of recipients should be investigated.

In addition, when overall reuse numbers get really large (2000 and more), it is a little worrisome when the device total and recipient total is identical as this suggests that perhaps the AT device is the core record and the associated recipient data could be duplicative. If one recipient acquires three devices but each are reported as separate reuse events, then that recipient is duplicated three times and they would need to provide three separate performance measures, which is not consistent with APR directions. This should have been reported as one reuse event with three devices and one performance measure.

Last updated January 2023

catada logo