CATADA:Training and Technical Assistance Materials
  • APR Data Fidelity Review
    • Demonstration
    • Short-term Device Loan
    • Reuse
    • State Financing Activities
    • Training (including ICT Accessibility Training)
    • Technical Assistance
    • Coordination/Collaboration & State Improvement Outcomes
    • Leveraged Funding
    • Performance Measures
    • Data Management System
    • Historical Data Review
  • Short-term versus Open-ended Loans
  • Annual Performance Report Data Structure
  • Assistive Technology “Maker” Activities
  • Assistive Technology Advisory Council
  • Annual AT Data & Fiscal Calendar
  • State Plan Expenditure Tracking & Reporting Reporting
    • AT Act Requirements for Expenditure Tracking
    • Categorizing Expenditures
    • State Plan Expenditure Reporting
    • Budgeting Cycle
  • Flexibility, Comparability & Data Reporting
  • Contract Compensation Options & Data Reporting
    • Period-Based Compensation
    • Unit-Based Compensation
    • Mixed Compensation
  • Managing & Leveraging Resources
    • Managing AT Act Resources
    • Leveraging and Reporting Additional Resources
  • Lead Agency & Implementing Entity
  • Leveraged Funding Understanding Grant Types
  • When is “demonstrating devices” a device demonstration?
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. APR Data Fidelity Review

Performance Measures

PreviousLeveraged FundingNextData Management System

Last updated 2 years ago

Performance measures must be collected directly from recipients/participants without inappropriate influence. The performance measure questions (i.e., did you make a decision) and the response options should be presented to the recipient/participant so they can affirmatively select their choice. The state AT program should keep documentation of the performance measure choice made by the recipient/participant for verification of performance measure data collected/reported in the APR (e.g., a form directly completed by the recipient/participant or similar verification).

Red Flag: All performance measure data is always 100%.

It is highly unlikely that a program will never have a non-respondent or will never have a recipient/participant who selects “I did not make a decision” unless there are procedures in place that somehow “discourage” undesirable responses. This is especially true with very large numbers (thousands of recipients/participants). It is especially suspicious when there are non-respondents reported in consumer satisfaction but not in performance measures because those data elements are frequently collected at the same time.

Last updated January 2023

catada logo